Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is founded and the employee is found guilty after because of process of law, it is the prerogative in the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the different penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is not really adequate though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful manner. Read more
Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children within the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.
The justices must be balanced between the political parties, these kinds of that neither party has an advantage of more than a single seat. To qualify to provide around the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice legislation in New Jersey for at least ten years. This could be the same necessity as for Superior Court judges.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition is often dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is really a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
Normally, only an appeal accepted by the court of past vacation resort will resolve such differences and, For most reasons, these appeals are frequently not granted.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive here authority, which is to offer substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.